Society and Culture Articles
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
  Page Loads: 44  
New Members

select

Learn More
select
Sign Up
Affiliate Sign in
Terms of Use
 
 
Navigation Menu

select

Home
select
Login
select
Submit Articles
select
Author Guidelines
select
Publisher Terms
select
Top Articles
select
About Us
select
Contact Us
select
Privacy Policy
select
Category RSS Feeds
 

 


Investing For Income -- Finally, Good News About 401(k) Plans

By : Richard Stooker    29 or more times read
Submitted 2010-07-10 07:44:56
One major obstacle to investing for income for many ordinary people who don't make megabucks is the choices given them by their 401(k) or other job-offered retirement plan.

I faced the same problem while still employed as a federal bureaucrat. I was given a choice of some broad index funds, but only the money market equivalent and the bond funds generated income.

401(k) Plan Administrators Are Finally Waking Up and Smelling the Coffee

The human resources consulting company Hewitt Associates recently conducted a survey of employers found that 74% were making efforts to reduce account expenses. 51% were moving to lower cost options. Specifically, they were replacing high-cost mutual funds charging a retail level of expenses with lower cost funds and even equivalent index funds.

Keeping expenses as low as possible has always been an integral part of my income investing program, and I have had no enthusiasm for mutual funds after I discovered how many hidden fees and costs come with them.

Expenses Often Determine Fund Performance

Recently, however, I've been reading COMMON SENSE ON MUTUAL FUNDS (the Fully Updated 10th Anniversary Edition) by John Bogle. He documents in great detail that the expense level of a fund -- ANY fund! -- is almost a precise determinant of its future return (in relation to other funds of the same type).

He lays out the evidence chart by chart, page by page. Over the years, the mutual funds with the highest expenses do worse than the mutual funds with the lowest expenses.

It's not a 100 direct relationship, of course, but there's a very high correlation. In many cases, funds that lag their overall sector do so by a margin very close to their expenses.

Choose Index Funds When They're Available

That's a good argument for index funds, because they should (as he points out -- with evident dismay-- not all of them do) have the lowest expenses. They have to maintain basic records, buy and sell securities only when the index changes (rarely) and hire customer service reps to answer the 800 number, and that's about it.

By the way, understand that Bogle found no evidence for the familiar evidence that some mutual funds are justified in charging higher expenses due to their performance. Funds with higher expense ratios underperformed low-expense funds.

It's good to see that companies are finally coming to understand this basic information, and making an effort to help their employees. And, I suspect, protect themselves from lawsuits from retired employees disgruntled by their final account balances.

It could also be that, since companies executives are covered by the same 401)k) plans, that they want better options for their own retirement portfolios.

Exchange Traded Funds Remain My Preference

I don't know if any laws prevent employers from offering exchange traded funds through 401(k) plans. I don't know why they don't. I know that many companies allow employees to put their retirement funds into their employer's own stock. If they can buy stock in one company, then why not stock in other companies or ETF shares, which are bought and sold the same as individual shares of stock.

It just occurred to me that companies can provide employees shares of their own stock without a broker, but they'd need a broker for any other securities. Yet they've been letting advisers offer mutual funds with front end loads, which is a lot more money than commissions, so it should be possible.

If you can pick and choose between individual securities, buy up exchange traded funds of income producing securities. If that's not possible, go with a combination of a S&P 500 and Lehman Brothers Total Bond index funds. Then you'll have to do your investing for income in a taxable brokerage account.
Author Information: You too can benefit from investing for income retirement and taxable accounts. Click here to get the information you need to effectively make money from your investments whether the markets go up or down. If you're ready to discover how investing for income can help you retire with financial security, visit this page, enter your email address into the form and click on the Submit Button. Then go to your inbox and verify that. It's free for the taking. http://www.incomeinvesthome.com/.
Article From Society and Culture


[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://societyandculture.org/rss.php?rss=318


Related Articles

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.



Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
Please Rate This Article:
Vote to see the results!

Do you like this article?
  • Yes.
  • Not Sure.
  • No.
Article Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites


Categories
Arts & Entertainment
Business
Career/Employment
Communications
Computers
Current Events
Education
Fashion
Finance
Food & Beverage
Health & Fitness
Healthcare
Home & Family
Pets & Animals
Product Reviews
Self Development
Society & Culture
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking
 
 

 


 

Copyright © 2010 - SocietyAndCulture.org
All Right Reserved